Utterly unscramble4/8/2023 The laws, which introduced dramatic new penalties for protesters who block roads, bridges and tunnels, were subject to fierce criticism from a coalition of unions, civil liberties groups and environmental activists when they passed through the state’s parliament with bipartisan support.īut the sentencing of Coco on Friday to a minimum of eight months’ jail for a protest on Sydney’s Harbour Bridge in April has sparked a renewed push for the laws to be repealed. They were poorly drafted and rushed through by a government who were terrified by climate protesters but more so by shock jocks and tabloid newspapers.” “It was an absolute rush, they smashed it through parliament in a couple of days and it’s clear it was an absolute scramble,” she said. NSW Greens MP Abigail Boyd said the rush to have the laws passed showed they were “a kneejerk reaction”. Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundupĮmails show that senior advisers in the offices of the premier, Dominic Perrottet, roads minister, Natalie Ward, and the attorney general, Mark Speakman, were all seeking to fast-track its assent with the governor. The government also took the unusual step of recalling the parliament for an extra sitting day to head off an attempted filibuster by the Greens. It was first introduced only a week after deputy premier and police minister, Paul Toole, held two press conferences on the same day promising harsher punishments. It took only two days for the bill to be voted through the NSW parliament with the support of the Labor opposition. The late-night signoff capped a mad scramble to push the laws through state parliament after a media furore over climate protests that had stalled Sydney peak hour traffic and halted operations at the Port Botany.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |